Monday, October 29, 2007

Big Dent in Bronco Alibi

Daily News (New York)

March 4, 1995, Saturday

BYLINE: By MICHELLE CARUSO in Los Angeles and LAURIE C. MERRILL in New York

Prosecutors in the O.J. Simpson case wrapped up their blistering cross-examination of Rosa Lopez yesterday leaving the credibility of the star alibi witness in tatters.
Even defense attorney Robert Shapiro conceded that there were problems with the testimony of the former maid of Simpson’s Brentwood, Calif., neighbors.
“To date she has been very consistent on some issues, and on some others she has clearly been inconsistent,” he said.
Yesterday afternoon, defense attorney Johnnie Cochran tried to salvage some of the damage wrought by prosecutor Chris Darden, asking Lopez if he ever coached her or gave her hand signals which she denied.
Lopez, who says she saw Simpson’s Bronco parked outside his mansion around the time prosecutors charge he was murdering his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, also denied trying to sell her story to the National En-qurier, The Globe or the Star.
In response to Cochran’s question, Lopez said she was not offered money by a lawyer or Simpson’s assistant.
But in earlier cross-examination, Darden asked about a taped interview in which another maid, Sylvia Guerra, said that Lopez was offered $ 5,000 to tes-tify on Simpson’s behalf.
“You’ve heard the tape of Sylvia’s interview with detectives in which she says you told her the lawyers were going to give you $ 5,000 for testifying, and that she could also get $ 5,000. . . . Is Sylvia lying?” Darden asked.
“One hundred per cent,” Lopez said.
“And you’re telling the truth?” Darden said.
“One hundred per cent,” Lopez said.
Darden also grilled Lopez on whether she had the proper vantage point to see the Bronco when she was out walking a dog. He suggested the only place in the neighbor’s yard to see where the Bronco was parked was a patch of ivy in the front.
“Have you ever told any one you believe there are snakes and rats in that ivy and you wouldn’t want to go in there?” Darden asked.
“At night, sir, in the back, yes sir, because it was very ugly . . . I never said that about the front,” Lopez responded.
Darden also sought to prove that Lopez had been led on in her interview with Simpson gumshoe Zvonko (Bill) Pavelic.
On the tape played yesterday, Lopez said at first she “took the dog [out for a walk] at 10.” There is a pregnant pause while papers are shuffled, then Lopez says, “I took the dog at 10:20 . . . I took the dog at 10:15.”
Lopez also gave different dates of birth a difference of seven years on her driver’s license and on her application for unemployment insurance, according to a court transcript released yesterday.

Posted by Jackson at 08:47:11 | Permalink | No Comments »

Balanced Budget Amendment Fails to Pass

ABC NEWS

March 2, 1995

HIGHLIGHT: The balanced budget amendment failed to pass in the Senate by a mar-gin of one vote.

GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL: On this vote, the yeas are 65; the nays are 35.
 
PETER JENNINGS, ABC News: [voice-over] For want of a single vote, the balanced budget amendment has not passed in the Senate; the exhibition baseball season begins for want of a crowd; and murder in Moscow - when a leading journalist is assassinated, the whole country is forced to pay attention.
 
ANNOUNCER: From ABC, this is World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
 
PETER JENNINGS: Good evening.  We begin on Capitol Hill tonight with politics, posturing and the balanced budget amendment.  Try as they might, the Republicans failed to swing over that one last vote today and the proposed constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget was defeated.  The Democrats proclaimed they had successfully protected the Social Security system from being raided; the Republicans said it was the American people who have lost.  It was, in short, a banner day for rhetoric.
 
In Washington, ABC’s John Cochran.
 
JOHN COCHRAN, ABC News: [voice-over] Militant to the end, freshman Republicans who said they came to Washington to cut government spending, staged an 11th hour photo op, warning Democrats to vote for the balanced budget amendment or else.
 
Rep. JOE SCARBOROUGH, (R), Florida: They need to get with the program or else they’re going to learn the hard way the lessons that their colleagues learned in the revolution of 1994 - Get on board or go back home.
 
Sen. FRED THOMPSON, (R), Tennessee: I hope they take their furniture and their belongings and their Rolodexes with them, because they’re not coming back.
 
JOHN COCHRAN: [voice-over] But senior citizens against the amendment staged a counter-photo op, complete with a birthday cake marking the 60th anniversary of Social Security and a warning that balancing the budget could lead to sharp cuts in Social Security benefits.
 
ARTHUR FLEMING, Save Our Social Security Coalition: We want Congress to cele-brate Social Security, not raid it.
 
JOHN COCHRAN: [voice-over] As the showdown finally arrived, everyone knew that with only 14 Democrats voting for the amendment, it would pass only if every Re-publican voted yes.  But one - Hatfield of Oregon - stood alone.
 
SENATOR: Mr. Hatfield - no.
 
JOHN COCHRAN: [voice-over] Even as the amendment was going down to defeat, Re-publicans were handing out old campaign commercials of Democrats who had prom-ised to vote for a balanced budget amendment.
 
ANNOUNCER: [Republican National Committee] Remember this Tom Daschle TV ad?  When he wanted our vote, he promised us he supported-
 
ANNOUNCER: [Daschle campaign commercial] The constitutional amendment to balance the budget.
 
JOHN COCHRAN: [voice-over] Daschle says he changed his mind because he believes the new Republican-controlled Congress would go after Social Security funds.  But it wasn’t Social Security that Republican presidential candidates were going after today, it was Bill Clinton.
 
Sen. BOB DOLE, Majority Leader: He has abdicated his responsibility on reducing the deficit.  And now he’s taken on 80 percent of the American people who want a balanced budget amendment.
 
Sen. PHIL GRAMM, (R), Texas: One way or another, we are not going to let Bill Clinton and the Democrats continue this spending spree.
 
JOHN COCHRAN: [voice-over] The President’s response had a little something for both conservatives and liberals.
 
Pres. BILL CLINTON: I believe we can reduce the deficit without compromising our commitment to education and to our children and without undermining our commit-ment to our seniors and Social Security and basic Medicare needs.
 
JOHN COCHRAN: So now the real fight begins - the fight not over an amendment that wouldn’t even take effect for several years, but over how deeply government programs should be cut this year.
 
John Cochran, ABC News, Capitol Hill.
 
PETER JENNINGS: One thing you can be sure of, the issue of Social Security and whether the benefits for future generations are in jeopardy is not going to go away.  And the rhetoric and the reality are sometimes quite different.
 
[voice-over] There is not, as popular imagination has it, some special Social Security bank account accumulating cash as the taxpayer contributes.  It is all part of the general government account from which the government borrows regu-larly to pay down the budget deficit.  The so-called surplus that’s been build-ing in Social Security for the last 10 years is nothing more than government IOU’s - pieces of paper.  Without the Social Security allocation, politicians would have to make even tougher decisions to balance the federal budget.  And very few want to do that.
 
[on camera] Let’s stay in Washington for a moment.  Today, religion, protection and tax dollars were making news.  Over the past few years, many followers of Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam have gone into the security business.  They’ve been patrolling some of the country’s most dangerous public housing projects.  They have government contracts in six cities.  Today, members of Congress held a hearing about how those firms operate.
 
Here’s ABC’s Michele Norris.
 
MICHELE NORRIS, ABC News: [voice-over] The question is whether the Nation of Is-lam, with its all-black Muslim-led security patrols, discriminates or promotes religious bigotry.
 
Rep. PETER KING, (R), New York: It was Louis Farrakhan who denounced Jewry as a gutter religion; who said that Hitler was a very great man; who said he would grind Jews and break them into little bits; and who denounced the Pope as a ‘no good cracker.’
 
MICHELE NORRIS: [voice-over] But Nation of Islam leaders maintained that they were being singled out and that the hearing smacked of religious McCarthyism.
 
LEONARD FARRAKHAN MUHAMMAD, New Life Self Development Co.: The focus should not be on what you have spent on so-called Muslim affiliated security companies.  Where is the focus on the money that we’ve saved you and the lives that we’ve saved?  Does anybody care about that, Mr. Chairman?
 
MICHELE NORRIS: [voice-over] The group also said a federal review found no evi-dence of discrimination.
 
HENRY CISNEROS, Secretary, Housing and Urban Development: In fact, we’ve con-ducted over 1,000 interviews of residents and management and they illustrate that these security guards have been effective.
 
MICHELE NORRIS: [voice-over] So effective that in one case - the Flag House com-plex in Baltimore - security patrols are credited with reducing crime by almost 50 percent, even though they do not carry guns.
 
[on camera] Residents here say the Nation of Islam patrols have helped transform this housing project.  The sound of gunfire, which was once so common, is now rare.  And children are once again allowed to play outdoors.
 
DOROTHY SCOTT, President, Flag House Tenants Association: We do not want NOI taken from us because it’s the best security we’ve ever had.
 
MICHELE NORRIS: [voice-over] But even statements like that don’t satisfy some members of Congress, who are calling for a review by the Justice Department.
 
Michele Norris, ABC News, Baltimore.
 
PETER JENNINGS: In a moment, we’ll have some of the day’s other news.
 
[voice-over] At the O.J. Simpson trial, the prosecution has a chance to examine a key defense witness; a tale of two shelters - the debate over compassion and cost; and why the record of the year is music to the ear of a professor of lit-erature in Vermont.
 
[Commercial break]
 
PETER JENNINGS: At the O.J. Simpson trial today, it was the prosecution’s turn to question the woman who the defense says may provide Simpson with an alibi for the time of the murder.  The jury was not in court, but the testimony of Rosa Lopez was recorded on videotape for possible playback later in the trial.
 
Here’s ABC’s Bill Redeker.
 
BILL REDEKER, ABC News: [voice-over] Once again prosecutors caught Rosa Lopez in a series of contradictions.  Although she previously testified that she saw Simpson’s Ford Bronco parked outside his house at the time of the murders, today she said she wasn’t so sure.
 
CHRISTOPHER DARDEN, Deputy District Attorney: Do you have a hard time remember-ing times?
 
ROSA LOPEZ: [through interpreter] If I don’t have it written down, how can I re-member?
 
BILL REDEKER: [voice-over] Lopez admitted that the first time she told her story to defense investigator Bill Pavelic, who recorded it, she did not mention ex-actly when she saw the vehicle.  In her second interview with the investigator, she seemed to agree that Pavelic fed her the answers.
 
CHRISTOPHER DARDEN: Did Mr. Pavelic tell you that you saw the Bronco at 10:15 or 10:20?
 
ROSA LOPEZ: [through interpreter] All I said was that it was after 10:00.
 
BILL REDEKER: [voice-over] Lopez said she couldn’t recall the time, date or even the season in which she talked with Pavelic.
 
In another development, new information today surrounding the 911 call Nicole Simpson made in October of 1993.
 
NICOLE BROWN SIMPSON: [October 25, 1993] Well, my ex-husband, or my husband, just broke into my house and he’s ranting and raving.  Now he’s just walked out into the front yard.
 
BILL REDEKER: ABC News has obtained a transcript of a secret tape recording made by Officer Craig Lalley following that call, when he responded to Nicole Simp-son’s house.
 
[voice-over] In the early morning hours of October 25th, Lally and his partner first interviewed Nicole and then O.J. Simpson.  The interviews may be used by both the prosecution and the defense.
 
Nicole - ‘I just got frightened tonight when he gets this crazed.  He gets a very animalistic look in him.  All his veins pop out.  His eyes are black and just black - I mean cold, like an animal.  I mean, very, very weird.  And when I see it, it just scares me.’
 
Police then asked O.J. Simpson about scaring his ex-wife.
 
Simpson - ‘Even before we split, she beat me on so many times and all I did was cover my groins and my face and let her beat on me.  We had a fight on New Year’s when she started a fight six years ago.’
 
Simpson’s explanation about what happened during the 1989 spouse abuse case may explain why prosecutors have not called Officer Lally to testify.  Eventually, O.J. Simpson agrees to leave, but not before Nicole Simpson tells police, ‘I think he wouldn’t hit me again because he had to do community service.  I think if it happened once more, it would be the last time.’
 
Bill Redeker, ABC News, Los Angeles.
 
PETER JENNINGS: In Moscow, a murder that has moved the nation.  Everybody in Russia who has a television set knows Vladislav Listyev.  Last night he was shot to death.  It seems to have been another hit by organized crime.  The Russians are certainly paying close attention, and that includes the President, Boris Yeltsin.
 
Here’s ABC’s Gillian Findlay.
 
GILLIAN FINDLAY, ABC News: [voice-over] He was one of Russia’s most popular TV personalities - a bit of Phil Donahue, a bit of Larry King.  His murder last night, apparently by hit men, sent an entire nation into mourning.
 
At Vladislav Listyev’s home today, hundreds gathered to share their grief.  At the TV center where he worked, there were hundreds more.  And on TV, all four Russian channels suspended regular programming for 12 hours to pay tribute.
 
Even Boris Yeltsin was visibly shaken.  To a meeting of Listyev’s co-workers, he conceded the war on crime was being lost and said he would fire Moscow’s chief of police and head prosecutor.
 
BORIS YELTSIN, President of Russia: [through interpreter] I bow my head as one of the leaders guilty of failing to ensure proper measures against banditry, corruption, bribery and crime.
 
GILLIAN FINDLAY: [voice-over] Listyev’s death seems to have little to do with his journalism.  Two months ago, the TV anchor was appointed to head Russia’s newly privatized TV network.  In doing so, he vowed to crack down on corruption, saying the tradition of kickbacks for advertising would end.  It may have cost him his life.
 
Tonight, in a broadcast reminiscent of Listyev’s own programs, many of Russia’s top journalists and politicians gathered to condemn the wave of corruption they say Boris Yeltsin is allowing to strangle their nation.
 
ARTYOM BOROVIK, Journalist: [through interpreter] I hope the president is lis-tening to us.  He must answer to what’s happening in this country.
 
GILLIAN FINDLAY: [voice-over] Russia’s crime wave has claimed many victims, but none so well known as Vladislav Listyev.
 
[on camera] While many Russians still doubt their government’s commitment to prosecuting such crimes, there is some hope that Listyev’s popularity will in fact pressure Yeltsin into finally living up to his promise and dealing with or-ganized crime.
 
Gillian Findlay, ABC News, Moscow.
 
PETER JENNINGS: Still overseas, the most dominant figure in Italian politics since World War II has been indicted.  Giulio Andreotti is charged with having consorted with the Mafia during his seven terms as the Italian premier.  Prose-cutors say that the Mafia delivered votes for his party; in exchange, he deliv-ered lucrative government contracts to companies the Mafia ran.  Mr. Andreotti denies it.  The trial is set for September.
 
[voice-over] In Germany, police have captured the international bond trader who broke a British bank.  The story when we come back.
 
[Commercial break]
 
PETER JENNINGS: The international search for the young man who helped bring down the oldest British investment bank is over.  Nicholas Leeson is in the custody of German police.  Leeson lost more than $1 billion of the company’s money in risky trades from his base in Singapore.  And then he ran.
 
Here’s ABC’s Garrick Utley.
 
GARRICK UTLEY, ABC News: [voice-over] Nicholas Leeson surfaced in Frankfurt af-ter a 19-hour overnight flight from Asia, economy class.  He and his wife trav-eled under their own names and said they were on their way to London, the head-quarters of Barings Bank.
 
Tonight, Leeson is being held in this detention center.  Tomorrow, he faces a hearing on Singapore’s request to German authorities for his extradition for fraud and forgery.  His wife has been released.
 
For a week, the couple has been on the run.  Fleeing Singapore, they went first to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where they spent one night in a hotel.  Then they moved on to Kota Kinabalu on the island of Borneo, where they stayed in a luxury resort while Leeson presumably thought about what to do next.
 
Yesterday, after flying to Brunei, they continued on to Europe aboard this plane.  They paid $2,055 each, cash.  Why was Leeson heading back to Europe?
 
FENTON BRESLER, Attorney: It’s just my conjecture, in order to face our people in London within the organization or outside the organization who could help him to prove his innocence.
 
GARRICK UTLEY: [voice-over] And if not his innocence, perhaps that the manage-ment of Barings shared responsibility.  Last month, an internal report said that financial controls in the Singapore office were lax, but that was not corrected.  And in the past month, the bank sent hundreds of millions of dollars to Singa-pore to cover Leeson’s losing financial bets.
 
[on camera] No small depositors lost in this bank failure.  Other banks and big investors put their money in Barings, including the Royal Family.  It’s esti-mated that Queen Elizabeth may lose up to $800,000.
 
Garrick Utley, ABC News, London.
 
PETER JENNINGS: It has not been a good day at the baseball talks in Scottsdale, Arizona, for the past couple of days.  Reports coming out of the talks between owners and players had been guardedly optimistic, but today the owner of the Colorado Rockies- Colorado Rockies, said things are bogged down again and talks may even break off completely.
 
Meanwhile, eight more teams began their spring training games today with nary a familiar face in sight.  Here’s ABC’s Mark Potter.
 
MARK POTTER, ABC News: [voice-over] For just a moment at the New York Yankee stadium in Ft. Lauderdale, it actually looked and sounded like the traditional start of major league spring exhibition baseball.  But the Yankee lineup today revealed only one player with major league experience - pitcher Frank Eufemia, who left the majors 10 years ago.  Most are career or former minor leaguers.  So far, fans are not flocking to see them.
 
[on camera] Last year’s spring game opener here in Ft. Lauderdale between the Yankees and the Mets drew nearly 7,000 fans.  Today, fewer than 700 showed up by the start of the game.
 
[voice-over] Attendance at the Minnesota-Pittsburgh game in Bradenton, was also down by more than half from last year.
 
BASEBALL FAN: You don’t have the same caliber of people out there, but I love the game so I’m here.
 
MARK POTTER: [voice-over] Because of the strike, spring training fans will see an odd mix of aging former stars like 48-year-old Pedro Borbon, who rejoined the Cincinnati Reds after a 15-year absence, and newcomers like Steven Spurgeon, who was a singer until he joined the Minnesota Twins.
 
STEVEN SPURGEN: This is a gift from God to be here and play professional base-ball.  If there’s something difficult about being here, then I haven’t found it yet.
 
MARK POTTER: [voice-over] But there are difficulties.  The Players’ union met with minor leaguers this week and strongly argued that playing spring training games is strike breaking.  Nearly 40 minor leaguers have left spring training camps run by Montreal, Texas and the New York Yankees recently, aware that some-day they could be major leaguers covered by the union.
 
BOBBY MacDONALD, Yankee Minor League Player: I’ve got to stand behind the union and what they say to do.  And what they say to do is for me not to play in these exhibition games.
 
MARK POTTER: [voice-over] Which is why it could be a very long month before the start of the regular season in April.
 
Mark Potter, ABC News, Ft. Lauderdale.
 
PETER JENNINGS: A note about health.  Federal health officials said today that anyone with an active case of tuberculosis should not be allowed on commercial airlines.  They have confirmed the first cases of tuberculosis transmitted from one passenger to another last year.  It had nothing to do with the plane’s ven-tilation system; the passenger with TB was coughing and spread the bacteria to four other passengers nearby.
 
On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrials lost more than 14 points today to close at 3,979.  On the NASDAQ market, stocks gained nearly 2 points.
 
Back in just a moment.
 
[Commercial break]
 
PETER JENNINGS: [voice-over] In Washington today, at a Senate hearing on aging, the politicians heard from one of the country’s dedicated workers in the field of treating alcoholics and drug abusers.  Bob Cote, from an organization called Step 13 in Denver, told the committee that government help only helps the ad-dicted stay addicted.
 
BOB COTE: I don’t think taxpayers should be subsidizing addiction.  It’s misdi-rected funding.  It should go to those that really need the hand up.
 
PETER JENNINGS: We have reported on Mr. Cote’s widely admired program in the past.  But we were also reminded today of how the rhetoric of debate in Washing-ton these days is something not always supported by the research.  The other day, the Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was comparing Step 13 to a govern-ment facility in Denver.  And we asked our Denver correspondent Tom Foreman to follow up.
 
TOM FOREMAN, ABC News: [voice-over] Step 13 is a widely-praised treatment pro-gram for hardcore alcoholics and drug abusers.  Private donors and the people who come here pay for the program - $320,000 a year.
 
Last week, in a speech, House Speaker Newt Gingrich praised Step 13 and compared it to the cost of a federally-funded facility in Denver.
 
Rep. NEWT GINGRICH, Speaker of the House: Would you like to guess what it costs?  A million?  Two million?  $8.8 million.  Guess which one saves more people?  The first one - 25 times as much money to ruin lives.
 
TOM FOREMAN: [voice-over] Gingrich was talking about Denver Cares.  And his of-fice admitted today he was wrong.
 
The budget for this 100-bed facility is not over $8 million, it is $3.2 million.  Only a third is federal money; the rest comes from local taxpayers.  But offi-cials at Denver Cares say he also missed the mark by even comparing two places with radically different missions.
 
RICHARD BERRY, Director, Denver Cares: Anyone that is a public inebriate really is a candidate for a stay here at Denver Cares.
 
TOM FOREMAN: [voice-over] Administrators say Denver Cares is a safety net, a last resort for addicts in deep trouble who might otherwise sleep, even die, on the streets.  And by law, all must be taken in.  Unlike Step 13, where people must assume personal responsibility and try to get better, many at Denver Cares are beyond improving or may not care.  Watching their medical condition is ex-pensive - $200 per bed, per night.  But without Denver Cares, many would wind up in nearby hospital beds, where the average cost is $800.
 
Dr. EDMUND CASPER, Denver Health and Hospitals: You either pay for it now or pay for it later.
 
TOM FOREMAN: And you think if you pay for it later-
 
Dr. EDMUND CASPER: It’s much more costly.
 
TOM FOREMAN: [voice-over] Denver Cares’ $3 million budget may deserve scrutiny.  Reformers may admire Step 13’s get-tough approach, but officials here say this time in the quest for reform, Washington got it wrong.
 
Tom Foreman, ABC News, Denver.
 
PETER JENNINGS: When we come back, the poet behind the song.
 
[Commercial break]
 
PETER JENNINGS: Finally from us this evening, the record of the year and the professor.  At the Grammy Awards last night, the record of the year was All I Want to Do by Sheryl Crow.  It was a popular victory, gratifying to lots of peo-ple, but none more so than a professor in Marlboro, Vermont.
 
Here’s ABC’s Beth Nissen.
 
BETH NISSEN, ABC News: [voice-over] Millions have found themselves singing the catchy chorus and listening to the offbeat lyrics.
 
SHERYL CROW: [singing] All I want to do is have a little fun before I die said the man next to me, out of nowhere.
 
BETH NISSEN: [voice-over] Sheryl Crow’s hit song is a frothy observation of life by beer buddies in an L.A. bar.  The slack, sly lyrics are based on a poem writ-ten by a professor of literature in rural Vermont.
 
Prof. WYN COOPER: The poem never really went anywhere.  I tried sending it to magazines; nobody wanted to publish it.
 
BETH NISSEN: [voice-over] So Professor Wyn Cooper published his own poetry col-lection.  Somehow, one of the 500 copies made its way to Sheryl Crow, who adapted Cooper’s poem Fun.
 
SHERYL CROW: [singing] I like a good beer buzz early in the morning.  Billy likes to peel the labels off his bottles of Bud.
 
BETH NISSEN: [voice-over] Cooper says he hopes the success of the song will in-spire other singers to use the work of poets; that poetry wil find it’s way into popular culture, measure by measure.
 
Prof. WYN COOPER: I think that there are a lot of good poets in this country right now writing very good poems and they have literally no audience.
 
BETH NISSEN: [voice-over] Cooper’s five-stanza poem has reached an epic audi-ence.  The song has sold more than one million copies.  Royalties have already earned the professor twice his $25,000 teaching salary.  But he says he intends to keep teaching and keeping writing verses until the end.
 
Beth Nissen, ABC News, New York.
 
PETER JENNINGS: That’s our report on World News Tonight.  Later this evening on Day One, searching for the endangered mountain gorillas in Rwanda.
 
I’m Peter Jennings.  Good night.
 
The preceding text has been professionally transcribed.  However, although the text has been checked against an audio track, in order to meet rigid distri-bution and transmission deadlines, it has not yet been proofread against video-tape.

Posted by Jackson at 08:45:31 | Permalink | No Comments »

Saturday, October 20, 2007

AIDS Victim Who Sold Blood Was Detained, Released Several Times

The Associated Press

July 1, 1987, Wednesday, PM cycle

SECTION: Domestic News

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

An AIDS victim accused of attempted murder after selling his blood was de-tained and released five times in recent months despite efforts by authorities to confine him to a mental health unit, investigators say.
“He was a time bomb just ready to explode,” Detective Bill Pavelic of the po-lice department’s mental evaluation unit said Tuesday. “We’re very disappointed he was not held. … There’s something drastically wrong here.”
Joseph Edward Markowski, a 29-year-old drifter, was charged with attempted murder Monday by District Attorney Ira Reiner after police discovered he was carrying a receipt for a blood donation. Markowski pleaded innocent.
Markowski allegedly told authorities he sold his potentially deadly blood for $8 to $10 a pint and sold sex on the streets of West Hollywood months after he had been diagnosed as having AIDS.
“I know that AIDS can kill. But I was so hard up for money I didn’t give a damn,” Reiner quoted Markowski as telling authorities.
Activists of the Gay & Lesbian Community Services Center criticized Reiner’s actions, saying Markowski should have been treated better by society.
“It’s important to see this gentleman as a victim, a homeless person wander-ing the streets with no housing available,” said Eric E. Rofes, executive direc-tor of the center, at a Tuesday news conference.
Neither county officials nor psychiatrists who treated Markowski would dis-cuss the case or respond to police comments Tuesday.
According to Pavelic, Los Angeles police first discovered Markowski had ac-quired immune deficiency syndrome last Feb. 3, after detaining him for walking against traffic on Sunset Boulevard.
On May 3, officers responding to a call found Markowski “crying, breaking down emotionally and stating that he would kill himself,” the detective said.
On both occasions, Pavelic said, Markowski was sent to the Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center psychiatric ward or another county facility, but

he was quickly released each time.
“We said that he had AIDS, that he was highly irrational, that he donated blood to various agencies and that he possibly had hepatitis,” Pavelic said.
The sheriff’s department picked up Markowski twice for similar incidents and sent him to a county hospital, with the same result, Pavelic said.

Sheriff’s spokesman Sgt. Merlyn Poppleton refused to confirm the referrals, saying he was prohibited by law from discussing Markowski’s record.
Last week, police were called to a West Hollywood bank where Markowski alleg-edly grabbed a security guard’s gun and screamed “Kill me! Kill me! I have AIDS.”
Markowski was referred to County-USC and again was released. However, police found a blood donation receipt, prompting the investigation leading to attempted murder charges.
Rofes and others who spoke at the news conference Tuesday said the charges ignore that Markowski was sick, homeless and in need of social services.
“Why do people with AIDS have to wait so long to get any governmental assis-tance?” asked Rofes. “Who is going to keep these people off the streets and keep them in food and clothing?”
AIDS is caused by a virus that attacks the body’s immune system, leaving vic-tims susceptible to a variety of infections and cancers. It is spread through blood and other body fluids.
The county Board of Supervisors proposed Tuesday that the county health de-partment and district attorney be ordered to investigate plasma banks to deter-mine if they received blood from Markowski.
The board also proposed a review of the operations of Plasma Productions As-sociates, which bought Markowski’s blood, and similar plasma centers.
Officials of the companies have said a screening system and heat-treating process guarantee that the AIDS virus won’t enter the blood supply.

Posted by Jackson at 07:12:14 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Questioned as Possible Cosby Witness

Authorities in New York have arrested two suspected extortionists in what was described as a failed attempt to blackmail Bill Cosby, while police in Los Angeles were were questioning two “possible witnesses” in connection with the slaying last week of the entertainment icon’s only son. Officials stressed Monday that they do not believe the two investigations are connected.

The U.S. attorney’s office in New York announced Monday that Autumn Jackson and Jose Medina, both of whom are from Southern California, sources said, had been arrested Saturday. Authorities said the two were threatening to take a story to the tabloid news media accusing Bill Cosby of fathering an illegitimate child–an allegation denied by Cosby’s spokesman. Officials on both coasts conferred Monday about that case and last Thursday’s shooting near Bel-Air of graduate student Ennis William Cosby and concluded that they are not part of a single plot against the Cosby family.

Federal prosecutors said the extortion suspects had sought $ 40 million from the entertainer and were meeting with Cosby’s attorneys in New York and were expecting to collect a $ 24-million settlement. Jackson, authorities said, had alleged that she was Cosby’s illegitimate daughter.

“This kind of activity is not something that is unique to Bill Cosby,” said Cosby spokesman David Brokaw. “It happens all the time to entertainment figures. It’s distressing and annoying and disruptive but he’s learned over the years how to protect his family and himself from this kind of invasion.”

In Los Angeles, detectives Monday questioned two men described as potential witnesses in the Cosby slaying. According to a source familiar with the case, the two men were seen driving a car similar to one described by a security guard as having been near the scene of the crime.  Police had announced Saturday they wanted to speak to the driver of that car, a blue hatchback, in the hopes that he might have seen events surrounding the killing of Ennis Cosby.

Driven in part by the release of composite photographs and in part by an escalating tabloid reward derby, Los Angeles police detectives are being forced into a sort of investigative triage, attempting to separate factual from fanciful accounts of Ennis Cosby’s slaying as he changed a tire near the San Diego Freeway. By midday Monday, police were sifting through more than 300 tips, some possibly serious clues, others passing observations or dubious suggestions.

On Sunday, Bill Cosby, speaking through his publicist, challenged print and electronic tabloids to stop paying for information about the case and to instead use that money to offer a reward. The National Enquirer was quick to respond, posting $ 100,000 for information leading to apprehension of the killer.

On Monday, Globe Communications, parent company of the Globe tabloid, upped the ante, offering a $ 200,000 reward. The Globe also intends to set up a toll-free number to accept tips about the case.

“In circumstances like this, it is often the case that individuals with information prefer to deal with someone other than the police,” the Globe said in a press release announcing its reward. “We will handle all tips with the utmost confidentiality.”

The offers of rewards can both assist and complicate the job of investigators. On one hand, experts say, the prospect of a reward may draw out some otherwise wary tipsters. But if the tips come from self-described eyewitnesses to the killing who withheld their accounts until there is money being offered, they could come back to haunt prosecutors.

Witnesses who cooperate with tabloids in return for money often find themselves subjected to withering criticism if they are called into court. In the O.J. Simpson case, for instance, one witness who told the grand jury that she saw a frantic Simpson moments after the murders was dropped and given a tongue lashing by prosecutor Marcia Clark after she admitted that she had accepted money from a tabloid for her story.  Although that money was offered as payment for a story and not as a reward, the witness’ acceptance of the cash cast such a cloud over her credibility that she was never called to testify during the criminal trial.

In the Cosby investigation, legal experts said the primary value of the rewards may be to draw out not eyewitnesses to the crime, but rather people who can identify the suspect from the composite drawing or otherwise aid police with secondhand information.

“The risk to credibility is a real risk,” said UCLA law professor Peter Arenella. “But it’s arguably well worth it if some individuals with secondhand information may help the police with their investigation.”

Tony Frost, editor of the Globe, said he was confident that the tabloid’s reward would not compromise the investigation.

“It’s not a fear because the information would be passed to the LAPD and their wealth of experience would be able to tell whether it witness was genuine or not,” Frost said. He added that the Globe would screen the tips first, and possibly use them for stories, but then would pass along information to the LAPD.

At the LAPD, Cmdr. Tim McBride emphasized that police would prefer to have witnesses come directly to authorities. “We are encouraging people to come to the police,” McBride said. “We’re not in partnership with the tabloids.”

The most helpful tips, police and outside observers agree, are those that might lead to the identification of two men: one who is being called the primary suspect in the case and another who is being labeled a possible witness.

Most of the tips thus far have gone straight to the department’s Robbery-Homicide Division, the same elite unit that handled the O.J.  Simpson investigation and other high-profile killings. LAPD press officers also have been receiving tips, said Cmdr. McBride, as have officers in other parts of the department, including the West Los Angeles Division, which covers the area where Ennis Cosby’s body was found last week.

The result is a massive exercise in what LAPD officials call “clue management,” the sifting of leads into credible tips and the rantings of wannabes who sometimes emerge to clamor for a place in a high-profile investigation.

“We appreciate the public’s help,” said McBride. “Some of the clues are clearly more critical than others. We try to focus our attention on the ones that may lead to a suspect.”

Robert W. Peterson, a private investigator who worked on the Simpson case, said that in the days ahead, police can expect to be on the receiving end of a cascade of information, much of it bad.

“Everybody in the world is going to turn in somebody they don’t like, a noisy neighbor or an ex-girlfriend or an ex-wife,” he said. “Going through all that is like an insurmountable task.”

Bill Pavelic, a former LAPD detective who now works as an investigator and consultant, said 99% of the calls to the Police Department are likely to be worthless–some from psychics, others from people playing amateur detective. But Pavelic said experienced detectives can quickly separate the wheat from the chaff.

The LAPD’s ability to run down scores of leads has been tested before, most notably during the investigation of the June 12, 1994, slayings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman. In that case, thousands of callers offered tips–some true, most false–as to the killer or other details of that case.

In the investigation, the issue was complicated by Simpson’s offer of a reward for information leading to the apprehension of the “real killer or killers.” The Simpson defense team set up a toll-free number, took thousands of tips, then turned over some of them to the LAPD, forcing police investigators to chase them down.

In the Cosby case, the suspect is being described as a white man of average height and weight between the ages of 25 and 32. Police released a composite sketch of him Saturday; in the picture, he is wearing a knit cap.

The other man–whom police said was in his late 20s to mid-30s with dark hair, a mustache and a goatee–is being sought as a possible witness.

For the more information about Bill Pavelic visit http://www.pavelic.info

Posted by Jackson at 07:00:38 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sleuth

JOHN McNALLY WAS AN OFF-DUTY NEW YORK POLICE detective on his way to visit his daughter Deborah in the hospital one winter night in 1969, when he spotted a robbery in progress at a liquor store near the Holland Tunnel. He pulled his car over and strolled into the store as if he were a customer.

A man with a pistol was standing behind a counter while a second man emptied one of the cash registers. When the robber moved to a second register, McNally suddenly drew his service revolver and stuck it under the man’s chin.

The other gunman whirled around and aimed his .32 at McNally, but his pistol misfired.

“Put down your gun if you want your friend to live,” McNally shouted.

The man tossed his gun to the floor.

“John was never off duty,” says Stan Kochman, an ex-NYPD cop and private investigator from New Jersey.

Kochman admits he’s not an impartial observer. As private investigators, he and McNally worked numerous cases together, including the Claus von Bulow appeal, masterminded by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz in 1985. After being convicted of attempting to murder his wife, heiress Martha “Sunny” von Bulow, with injections of insulin, Von Bulow was granted a new trial. The second jury found him not guilty.

“McNally was a legend in the police department,” Kochman recalls. “He wasn’t intimidated by anything.”

McNally has been a private investigator now for 22 years. Since 1983 he and his partner, Pat McKenna, have been based in West Palm Beach, though McNally still maintains an office in New York City. During this time, they have worked for many of the most prominent criminal defense attorneys in the country.

Unlike his famous clients, very little is known about McNally, who was born in Brooklyn in 1933. He usually makes every effort to avoid the media, though that proved impossible when he stepped off a plane in Los Angeles last July to head the investigation for the O.J. Simpson defense team.

Every reporter within shouting distance wanted an interview. Time magazine, grasping for information, published a story headlined: “Who Are These Guys, Anyway?”

The article painted a less-than-flattering portrait of McNally, but a very different image emerged when the PI finally agreed to an interview with Sunshine in Los Angeles, in between tracking down crucial evidence for Robert Shapiro, Simpson’s lead attorney.

IT IS A BRIGHT SATURDAY afternoon at a Bel Air hotel on Sunset Boulevard, and McNally and McKenna are relaxing at a poolside table, their cellular phones close by. McNally, whose hair and beard are gray, could be a finalist in the annual Key West Ernest Hemingway look-a-like contest.

He makes it clear that he wouldn’t have agreed to the Sunshine interview if it wasn’t a favor for F. Lee Bailey, the flamboyant Palm Beach defense attorney who gave McNally his start in the private-investigation business and was responsible for McNally joining the Simpson team.

Throughout the interview, McNally refuses to embellish his exploits and offers only sparse information about his personal life.

He grew up in Brooklyn, attended a Catholic high school and enlisted in the Navy at 17. When he was discharged from the service, he joined the New York police department.

He moved up quickly through the ranks and became the youngest man in the department to make detective first-grade. In 1964, he was credited with helping to break one of the most famous jewel robberies in American history.

That was the year Miami man-about-town Jack “Murph the Surf” Murphy and two companions broke into Manhattan’s Museum of Natural History and stole the Star of India - the largest sapphire in the world - along with other priceless jewels.

Tapping his sources on the street, McNally learned that a group of out-of-town men had been spotted partying at a local hotel.

“I ran down the lead the same day,” McNally says, “and turned the information over to the FBI.”

Two days later, the FBI arrested Murph the Surf in Miami and recovered the Star of India.

After receiving 22 commendations during his career, McNally retired from the NYPD in 1971.

The following year, he was referred to F. Lee Bailey, who had come to New York on a murder case involving two brothers named Jacobson. Bailey asked McNally to check out a rumor that the prosecution was planning to coach a witness during a mock trial scheduled to take place in an empty courtroom over the weekend.

Posing as a janitor, McNally put on old clothes and mopped his way into the courtroom where the witness was being questioned. The next day in court Bailey asked the witness if she had been coached in her testimony. When she said no, Bailey informed the prosecution that McNally could verify the witness was lying. Bailey won the case, and he and McNally began their long association.

Since being licensed as a PI in 1972, McNally has worked almost exclusively for elite criminal defense attorneys. Though he won’t discuss his fees, they are substantial. He doesn’t advertise, and never had to perform such mundane tasks as domestic surveillance.

“I started out at the top,” he says. “Lee was my jump-off point.”

INTERVIEWS WITH THE ATTORneys McNally has worked for bring a sharper portrait of him into focus. There is a remarkable degree of consistency in their feelings about the investigator, who, they say, is the best in the business.

Fred Hafetz, a longtime lawyer and a former chief of the criminal division in the U.S. Attorney’s Office, has used McNally’s services for more than 20 years. He met the PI in the early ’70s, when Hafetz was representing a defendant in a murder case and needed to locate a witness.

“All we had was a nickname and a little information about the neighborhood,” Hafetz remembers. “I turned the information over to John on Friday. On Saturday he found the man. Amazing.”

What comes across repeatedly is McNally’s ability to find witnesses and to get them to talk. When asked how he does it, he shrugs, saying, “You have to work to get them on your side. I try to take that extra step. Other PIs might interview someone by phone. I like to do it face to face.”

McNally’s world is not the slam-bang stuff of TV heroes like Tom Selleck of Magnum P.I. or James Garner of The Rockford Files. There are no car chases or shootouts. McNally has a gun license in both Florida and New York, but he seldom carries a weapon.

Not that there haven’t been a few tense moments.

Gerald Alch was a criminal defense attorney for 34 years before becoming a district court judge in Massachusetts. In the mid-’70s he was working a murder case in Indiana, and McNally was along as his investigator. When Alch received an anonymous death threat, McNally insisted that as a precaution they trade motel rooms.

“When you have a private investigator who’s willing to take a bullet for you, it’s pretty hard not to have confidence in him,” Alch says.

Barry Slotnick, a New York attorney who in 1984 hired McNally to investigate the case of subway gunman Bernhard Goetz, tells a story that illustrates McNally’s ability to get the kind of information that can prove vital during a trial.

In 1980, Slotnick was defending two young Hasidic Jews charged with attempted murder. Searching for a key witness for the prosecution, McNally moved seamlessly through the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn, a mixed-race neighborhood where Hasidic men wear black formal garb and full beards. Finally, he found the witness and interviewed him. When he briefed Slotnick, McNally said he was certain the witness had been smoking marijuana during the incident he claimed to have seen.

Dubious, Slotnick told McNally it hadn’t been mentioned in the police report.

McNally shrugged. “Well, I guess they didn’t pick up on it.”

When Slotnick questioned the witness in court, he asked the man if he had been smoking marijuana at the time, and the witness said yes. Then Slotnick asked him if he was able to see the event while he was smoking.

“Yeah, man,” the witness said. “Marijuana makes me see better.”

Slotnick’s clients were acquitted.

AT THE HOTEL ON SUNset Boulevard, McNally and McKenna are drinking out of cans of beer from their cooler, and McNally is feeding potato chips to a squirrel that has scampered up to the table.

What does he think about the Time magazine article that quoted an assistant U.S. Attorney as saying McNally was a confidant of Gambino crime-family members? The question clearly irritates the PI.

“If I work for five different lawyers, am I the confidant of five different defendants?” he asks rhetorically. “No. It’s because of the lawyers I work for.”

Lee Bailey, coming to McNally’s defense, says, “If John were a confidant of the mob, I wouldn’t be introducing him to any of my clients.”

When Judge Gerald Alch is asked the same question, he reacts in disbelief. “You’ve heard of the impossible dream? That’s the unleapable stretch. John has the ability to get the job done without ever crossing the ethical or moral line. He never gets that line blurred.”

According to Time magazine, McNally does have his detractors, but it is difficult to put a name to such sources as “a high-ranking member of the NYPD” or verify the statement that “law-enforcement sources” told Time that McNally was the target of an FBI investigation.

When asked about the Time story, an FBI spokeswoman said that the agency would not confirm or deny any investigation, past or present. She added, however, that the “law-enforcement source” mentioned in Time was not the FBI.

The news that McNally and McKenna were working for O.J. Simpson’s defense team was not warmly received by a group of California private investigators, and a complaint was filed by the Los Angeles County Criminal Investigators Association. Their law firm sent McNally and McKenna a cease-and-desist order, stating that they were not licensed to operate in California.

McNally flips open a thick, three-ring binder and jabs at a page.

“I called Sacramento (the state capital) when I first got out here and was told I did not have to have a California license to work a particular case,” he says with heat in his voice. “I called a second time to confirm that and I was told the same thing.”

When asked if there were any other investigators involved on the Simpson case, McNally nods his head.

“Yeah,” he says. “We have an ex-LAPD sergeant named Bill Pavelic acting as a consultant.”McNally smiles at McKenna. “We are that ‘army of investigators’ you keep hearing about.”

McNALLY HAS HAD HIS SHARE of personal tragedies. His son, John, was killed in a car accident in New York in 1981. Devastated, McNally and his wife, Elaine, left New York for South Florida, and bought a condo in Jupiter, where McNally took a two-year hiatus from his work. Elaine died in 1992.

Today, McNally devotes himself to his private-investigation business, which has grown dramatically since he moved to Florida. Over the years, he has built up a network of PIs he calls on when he’s too busy to handle a case himself. Using this network, he was able to put together a team to investigate the country’s first toxic-dumping racketeering case in 1990.

New York attorney Michael Walsh represented one of the corporations charged with the illegal dumping of medical waste. McNally set up surveillance teams to follow hospital employees to determine who was actually dumping the waste products.

The information that McNally’s team uncovered convinced the jury that it was hospital employees, either intentionally or negligently, who were improperly disposing of tons of toxic waste.

In this case, as in many others, McNally got little credit for turning a case in the client’s favor.

“It’s not important for John to take credit for a lawyer’s success in the courtroom,” Walsh says. “I like to think of him as the stealth detective.”

F. LEE BAILEY HAS LONG BEEN an advocate of the value of a top-flight investigator. “I’m a great believer in the notion that if your investigator is good enough, almost any lawyer will do,” he says.

Bailey devoted a section of his 1982 book, To Be A Trial Lawyer, to the responsibilities and skills of a PI. The attorney believes that an investigator must try to ensure that the lawyer he’s working for gets no surprises during the trial.

McNally agrees.

“It’s just as important to find out the bad stuff as the good stuff,” he says.

To do this, McNally puts a witness at ease, then obtains a statement without the subpoena power of the police.

Miami attorney Jay Hogan has known McNally since the PI moved to Florida 13 years ago.

“John can talk to a guy in a candy store or a penthouse or the CEO of a corporation,” Hogan says. “He seems to be the kind of man who invokes trust from all kinds of people.”

On his first contact with a witness, McNally identifies the law firm he’s working for and then presents his calling card.

“I’ll ask if they’ve read the police report that has their statement in it,” he explains. “If they say no, I’ll give it to them. You’ve got to give a little to get a little. Often they’ll finish reading the police report and tell me, ‘That’s not what I said.’ Then I’ll ask, ‘So what did you say?’ “

McNally tries to form a bond of trust with the witness that lasts throughout the trial. Sometimes an attorney will ask him to go back to a reluctant witness and persuade him to testify. In a case like this, McNally says that the best approach is to appeal to the witness’ sense of fair play.

“With each witness, I have to be as good as my word,” he says.

IT’S APPROACHING 4 O’CLOCK, and McNally announces that he has to meet someone in Malibu and excuses himself to get ready. Pat McKenna stays at the table to talk about the man he is assisting in the Simpson case.

McKenna has a master’s degree in criminology and is a former corrections-parole officer who came to Florida from Calumet City, Ill., in 1978. He has traveled to Europe and South America on investigations and worked such high-profile assignments as the IRA Stinger-missile case in West Palm Beach in 1990 and the William Kennedy Smith rape saga in 1991. He and McNally have been associates for more than a decade.

McKenna is tanned and looks fit.

“I’m 46 and can’t keep up with the guy,” he says about the less-than-svelte McNally. “John is always thinking, always on his toes. He never rests.”

McKenna admits he is in awe of McNally, even though they sometimes argue and challenge each other about tactics. McKenna talks of how proud he was when, as a notary public, he was asked to perform the wedding ceremony for McNally’s daughter, Eileen, in Jupiter. He also mentions McNally’s generosity.

“John could have had the William Kennedy Smith case, but he gave it to me,” McKenna says.

He frowns, trying to come up with a fitting way to express admiration for his friend and mentor.

 

“I’ve learned a lot on my own, but when I’m with John, I know I’m working with the master,” he says. “It’s like a painter being asked to work with Michelangelo.”

Posted by Jackson at 06:56:01 | Permalink | No Comments »

Friday, September 28, 2007

Bill Pavelic Speaking Out and Exposing Racism and Racist Cops

In 1991, Bill Pavelic established himself as the foremost insider critic of racism and corruption in the LAPD.  

Bill Pavelic has been the subject of many articles nationally and internationally for speaking out against and exposing racism that he personally witnessed as a LAPD Detective.

On June 30, 1992, Bill Pavelic sent the following letter to the Los Angeles Sentinel concerning the institutionalized racism, corruption, and sexism, of the LAPD under Chief Daryl Gates’ leadership.

                 
To: Los Angeles Sentinel Opinion Section

As a 19 year veteran of the Los Angeles Police Department, I am elated that Chief Gates was forced into retirement. His corrupt managerial style, coupled with his inflammatory and intemperate public comments, have done irreparable damage to the City of Los Angeles and its police department.

Daryl Gates and his close associates are suffering from a disease called megalomania……an exaggerated belief in their own greatness and that of the organization. In order to maintain a mythical status of being “the best law enforcement agency in the world” the LAPD management developed a bunker mentality and consciously impeded and retarded investigations or inquiries which reflected poorly on the organization. The “us against them” mentality required faulty analysis which was oftentimes based on pseudo reasoning, clever fallacies and distorted or manufactured evidence.

The disciplinary system under the leadership of Daryl Gates lacked consistency, uniformity and equality and sent a deplorable signal to others on the force, that it is OK to falsify official investigations, violate the LAPD manual, discredit the Code of Ethics and be dishonest as long as you are a member of management or have friends at the top who will protect you even when prima facie evidence of a crime is clearly evident.

Chief Gates has failed to hold accountable personnel under his control who were acting under the color of law and were exercising illegal direction under the guise of official authority. In no sphere of public life is this practice more repugnant than in law enforcement. Chief Gates, who morally bankrupt the Los Angeles Police Department, forgot, or never knew, that true leadership can be gained only by an intolerance of wrong doing…and…unless we all abide by the highest standards among ourselves, we have no business enforcing the law upon others.

Chief Gates used the Internal Affairs Division to intimidate those officers who dared to speak out against Los Angeles Police Department’s institutionalized racism, corruption, sexism, mismanagement, promotional cronyism and other sensitive issues. If the Internal Affairs Division didn’t get these “disloyal” police officers, like the Russian KGB, the organization could always count on the Medical Liaison Unit to send these officers to the Department shrink…to certify them as functionally crazy.

Under the leadership of Chief Williams, respect for individual dignity will once again become an integral part of the Los Angeles Police Department’s philosophy…a philosophy that will be based on the principles of professionalism, reverence for the law and harmony between the police and the community it serves.

Respectfully,

Bill Pavelic, Southwest Division

Posted by Jackson at 13:31:05 | Permalink | No Comments »

About Bill Pavelic on “AMERICAN TRAGEDY” BY LARRY SHILLER

“…Bill Pavelic was especially proud of his street sense. He had been one of the few (LAPD) Caucasian cops; he liked to tell friends, who understood how things really worked in the black community. He got so deep into it that he saw things, he was certain, through nonwhite eyes. He discovered that African-Americans and dark-skinned immigrants of all backgrounds had a lot to fear from the LAPD.  When the department couldn’t prove something, some cops had no problem framing people who couldn’t fight back. Pavelic complained loudly, and soon enough he was seen as disloyal. Before long, he was out…”

“…I know (LAPD) Robbery-Homicide Division. I’ve actually seen them frame innocent people.  You can’t take anything for granted…” 

“…Pavelic studied the LAPD’s crime-scene logs. He called friends at LAPD to see what else he could learn. He put in twenty-hour days, and finally what happened in the early hours of June 13 started to come together…”

“…Pavelic got a call from an officer on another matter. As they spoke, he realized that the cop was connected to the Simpson investigation. He said the department thought there was more than one killer. The wounds suggested each victim was murdered with a different weapon. Goldman’s injuries indicated he had fought fiercely before he died…”

“…Pavelic felt that there was no private investigator in town better at living inside the collective mind of the LAPD than himself. He was an expert on the department’s rules and procedures. He’d been on the force for eighteen years, won hundreds of medals, commendations, favorable incident reports…”

“…It was Pavelic who gave them their first real hope, however elusive: He saw corruption in the police casework…”

“…Under any circumstances, Pavelic would have looked for it. His career with the LAPD had ended in angry protest.  In 1984, Pavelic had testified against fellow officers who killed a fleeing suspect. One cop was fired, another suspended for six months.  Pavelic assumed he was stigmatized forever. But by 1990, he’d made it to supervising detective in the Southwest Division. Then he got in trouble again.

His men were investigating a date rape at USC when their bosses began showing a heavy-handed interest.  Pavelic, his partner, and their immediate supervisor eventually concluded that then-chief Daryl Gates and a deputy chief were listening to the suspect’s father, a prominent lawyer with influence inside the department.

Pavelic and his men protested publicly. And Bill raised similar charges again before a “people’s tribunal” when activist groups held hearings on the LAPD after the Rodney King beating.  Pavelic told the crowd that lying and covering up were the norm in the department.  That earned him a desk job. In 1992, he and the brass reached an accommodation.  He took a disability pension for asthma and chest pains. He told one doctor he’d rather spend time in a gulag than go back to work…” 

“…When Shapiro called, Zvonko “Bill” Pavelic was in his basement office at home in Glendale, cut off from everything. Pavelic finished his investigations that way. He isolated himself with his computer and his tapes from mid-morning till midnight or later. He allowed himself only one break, for dinner with Maria and the kids. He was proud of his tight, loyal family.  That was one reason he worked at home in the big house that Maria kept so well…” 

“…Robert Shapiro called just before eleven P.M. They’d worked together three years. Pavelic liked the lawyer’s style-intellectual, highly organized, well prepared. Shapiro’s particular genius, he thought, was laying a foundation so solid that the case was a winner no matter who presented it. They had won every case they’d worked on…” 

“…Would Pavelic like to join the defense team in the Simpson case? Shapiro asked. “Are you available?” Naturally Pavelic said yes. He apologized because he couldn’t make Shapiro’s first meeting the next day. But he shifted into gear mentally while he was still talking. He’d need Maria to clip newspapers. He knew he had to identify the documents already being generated in the case. The prosecution’s discovery file would undoubtedly be voluminous…” 

“…Bill Pavelic met Robert Shapiro at his office in Century City. Elegantly appointed with original art, Baccarat and Lalique crystal. Polished and expensive, like its occupant. Then they moved to a conference room. Their forty-five-minute meeting ranged over the entire case.  Nothing would be easy, Shapiro said. An arrest might be coming soon. He needed the investigator to do what he did best, run parallel with the police detectives and figure out how they saw things; then, as soon as possible, move their own investigation ahead of them. As always, the first days were the most important…” 

“…His one experience with O.J. Simpson was part of his police history. When Simpson was one of the runners carrying the Olympic torch before the 1984 games in Los Angeles.  Pavelic was assigned to protect VIPs. He and Simpson had talked briefly in the special seating section. Around that time, the International Olympic Committee’s Life President, Lord Killenin, nearly died choking on his food. Pavelic had saved his life and he thought Simpson might remember the incident…” 

“… He put his background to work as a private investigator and learned to make his computer think like a cop. That was why he was so concerned with early discovery material. If you took the documents, the crime reports, the logs, the affidavits and connected them to each piece of evidence, then considered how each cop might view it, then you could make a pretty good guess where the department was going with the case. You could see who’d like one thing, who favored another. Sometimes you could see their destination and arrive there ahead of them…”

“…As an ex-cop, he drew on his knowledge of what the police do at a crime scene. They don’t always go by the book. They cut corners-some officers more than others-but their reports make them sound like Boy Scouts.  Pavelic knew how to read between the lines of police verbiage and find the hidden stories in the photographs the D.A. had turned over…” 

“..Pavelic knew that Robbery-Homicide, the elite corps of detectives from LAPD, would be assigned the case when it became known that Simpson’s ex-wife was involved…” 

“…As a private investigator, Pavelic was particularly good at following law enforcement paper trails. He was immediately suspicious of the lack of specifics in the Bundy and Rockingham reports. Pavelic’s red alert signals flashed as he studied Phil Vannatter’s affidavit for the Rockingham search warrant. 

No indication who found the bloody glove. Nothing about going into Kato Kaelin’s room. Very little information about the murders at Bundy. Nothing about climbing the wall. Vannatter’s affidavit said they learned, after talking to Arnelle and Kato, that Simpson had left on an “unexpected” trip to Chicago. More important, the information about Arnelle and Kato was a handwritten addition to the typed affidavit. Had the judge or someone else asked a question during the hearing that prompted Vannatter’s addendum? Bill knew they’d called Cathy Randa and learned from her that Simpson’s trip was a planned business trip. The detective had misrepresented the facts about the departure in order to obtain the search warrant. O.J.’s departure was not “unexpected.” Vannatter knew that. Pavelic knew then that Vannatter had been forced into a further material omission, the omission of the fact that they had scaled the wall at Rockingham before obtaining the search warrant.  He also noticed that the affidavit said that Simpson took the flight “in the early morning hours of June 13, 1994.” That expanded the window available for the killings. The cops further “observed” the glove on the back walkway “during the securing of the residence.” Whether intentional or not, the language suggested that the LAPD investigators had assumed at once they had a crime scene. 

Vannatter wrote that “scientific investigation” confirmed that human blood was found on the Bronco. Pavelic knew that at the time he wrote the affidavit, only a routine presumptive test had been done. 

Detective Vannatter had more than twenty years on the force, but his affidavit was amateurish. Why had he omitted so many damaging details? Pavelic suspected that the LAPD was rearranging things and embellishing information. Vannatter and Lange, for example, had failed to log themselves out of Bundy when they went to Rockingham. The police logs showed them signing out at ten A.M. as if they’d never left Nicole’s condo. 

He also noticed that the criminalists didn’t list how many samples of each bloodstain were taken. A deliberate omission? No doubt in Pavelic’s mind. 

A few days before the preliminary hearing, Shapiro received a twenty nine-page memo outlining every mistake Pavelic saw…”

“…The week before, only two days after the Bronco chase, Pavelic had put together a memo for Shapiro asking for sixty-eight pieces of LAPD paperwork, ranging from communication tapes and follow-up investigative reports to the watch commander’s daily reports. He also requested the table of contents for the murder books, which contained virtually everything the detectives had…” 

“…Earlier in the week, when Mark Fuhrman said he had found the glove, Pavelic was stunned. This was the guy who found the glove? That night Pavelic went to his computer. By now he had a program in place that tracked every individual involved in the case: what evidence each person looked at, what reports each one filed…” 

He couldn’t find a single LAPD report identifying Fuhrman as the cop who found the glove. Not even the search warrant affidavit. As far as you could see in the paperwork, Fuhrman hadn’t noticed the blood on and in the Bronco. He hadn’t gone over the wall, hadn’t interrogated Kato Kaelin. In fact, he hadn’t been at Rockingham that morning.

The Bundy crime-scene log listed Fuhrman arriving at 2:10 A.M., leaving at ten A.M. Period. At Rockingham, he was logged in at 5:l5 the following afternoon and left at 7:10 P.M. 

If the logs were to be believed, Fuhrman had never left Bundy to go to Rockingham with Vannatter, Lange, and Phillips. He hadn’t returned to point at the Bundy glove while a police photographer snapped a picture. He didn’t take a Polaroid of the Bundy glove to Rockingham so Vannatter could make a comparison. The man who wasn’t there. 

Pavelic started to put the facts together. Robert Deutsch, a lawyer Pavelic knew, called him that night. “Bill, do you realize who this Fuhrman is?” “I guess I don’t.” Fuhrman had been part of the Britton case, which Deutsch and Pavelic had worked together. A black man armed with a knife had robbed and brutally beaten people at automatic teller machines on L.A.’s West Side in 1988. Fuhrman was part of a CRASH Unit stakeout team that spotted Joseph Britton threatening someone with a knife at an ATM. Britton ran. He claimed he tossed the knife over a hedge before the cops chased him down. The CRASH team said Britton waved the knife at them. 

They shot him six times. Most of the bullets came from Mark Fuhrman’s gun. Britton claimed that Fuhrman walked back to the hedge to get the knife and dropped it beside him. “Are you still alive, nigger?” he sneered at the wounded man. Britton went to prison and sued the LAPD for using excessive force. Fuhrman was that cop. Once reminded of the connection, Pavelic remembered that the Britton incident was just one item in a hefty dossier.

Years earlier, Pavelic had checked out everyone on the CRASH team and found pure gold under Fuhrman’s name. The detective had filed for a disability pension in September 1981. He wanted out because of stress. The records said that a department psychiatrist had given him a temporary medical leave a month before he filed. The detective complained that he was getting angrier and angrier at “low-class” people, notably Latino and black gang members-angry enough to kill someone. In one of the interview summaries, a doctor reported that Fuhrman used the word “nigger.”

Pavelic knew that in April 1982 the Workers Compensation Appeals Board had judged Fuhrman temporarily disabled and given him time off. But a year later the Board of Pension Commissioners looked at a thick stack of contradictory psychiatric reports and concluded Fuhrman should go back to work.

“I’m going to need the pension reports and Fuhrman’s psychological profiles,” Bill told his friend. Deutsch was happy to send them to Shapiro. 

Some therapists wrote that Fuhrman shouldn’t carry a gun. Others felt he was exaggerating the street trouble he saw in hopes of bailing out of a job he didn’t like with a golden parachute. The LAPD had an unusually large number of officers applying for stress pensions in those days. It was getting expensive. The force wasn’t about to let anyone out easily. Fuhrman appealed the Pension Board judgment to Superior Court. That put his psychiatric evaluations on the public record. 

Bill also began hearing from LAPD friends who had watched the preliminary hearings. “Please be advised that several LAPD police officers and detectives have contacted me and are eager to help O.J.,” he wrote in a memo to Shapiro. “If there is one common denominator in these phone calls, it is that Mark Fuhrman is a pathological liar.” 

Of course, nothing is ever simple in an investigator’s life. Pavelic began to suspect that the LAPD was sending him disinformation. Anything to make the defense waste time and money.

A letter signed “Blue” from a writer claiming to be a black LAPD lieutenant advised O.J. to hire Johnnie Cochran, and concluded: “All stops are being pulled in your case. Strings are being pulled across the country.  The L.A.P.D. and the D.A. do not want to lose your case, so beware. I know for a fact that lies are being blended into your case.”

Posted by Jackson at 13:20:50 | Permalink | No Comments »